I could feel the lip beginning to curl yesterday, as Max Clifford talked Radio 5 Live through the implications of the topic du jour, super-injunctions, in the light of revelations over a BBC journalist’s affair.
“The best form of stopping these stories used to be anticipation; to make sure it never came out,” he opined. “To make sure that no-one found out or became aware.”
At first hearing, it sounded like the craven call of amorality, edging around the elephant in the room. Surely a far simpler form of stopping such stories is not having affairs in the first place? You either live up to your vows or bring a dignified end to a moribund marriage but you avoid at all costs becoming one of the wretched in-betweeners who opts to have his cake and eat it.
Then it occurred to me that I was being harsh, expecting Max Clifford to shoot himself in the foot. For isn’t there just a chance that if more people focused on doing the right thing over the expedient thing, he would be out of a job?

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=831ea200-575e-4b1e-9596-de852f79ca2d)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=dd1ac869-6d4b-495c-87e8-0768ddca34bc)
